My blood pressure is a bit high today.
(I was going to link to the article, but I can't seem to find the same version that's in the paper. here is a version of it.)
This is followed by four pages of sycophantic coverage of Ken Ham's monstrosity, with only passing mention given to the ideas of "science", "reason" and "evidence".
Of course, I had to do something to fix this. So here's my improved version of the article: